Bankless co-founder David Hoffman has elaborated on his decision to sell his remaining ETH and rotate capital into other crypto assets, with Lighter (LIT) now taking the final tranche of that allocation. His comments on X framed the move not as a rejection of Ethereum’s technology, but as a reassessment of ETH’s investment upside relative to other tokens with clearer value-capture mechanics.
Hoffman Says ETH Thesis Played Out, Not Failed
Hoffman first signaled around May 21, 2026, that he had sold his final ETH holdings, though he did not disclose the size of the position. The move drew criticism from some Ethereum-aligned users, particularly because Hoffman has long been publicly associated with Ethereum through Bankless. In response, he emphasized that changing an investment thesis after a long holding period should not be treated as abandonment of the underlying network.
His argument is more specific than “Ethereum is dead.” Hoffman remains bullish on Ethereum as infrastructure, but says the asset-level thesis for ETH has matured. He has described the “ETH is money” thesis as having “played out,” meaning, in his view, ETH already received much of the market repricing it deserved and may not be structurally rerated much higher or lower simply because Ethereum keeps growing.
That distinction matters for ETH investors. Hoffman’s view is that Ethereum can continue to win across applications, L2s, stablecoins, tokenization and DeFi, while only a marginal share of that success accrues directly to ETH holders. He has framed Ethereum as a “giver, not a taker”: a network that provides secure settlement and blockspace cheaply, while rollups, applications and other layers may capture more of the economics.
Hoffman also disclosed how he redeployed the capital after exiting ETH. “After selling ETH, I immediately took ~50% of the capital to VVV, NEAR, ZEC, HYPE. I left the rest as capital to DCA into something not already up multiples other than NEAR, which was ~1.40 at the time. I’ve finished buying LIT with that remaining 50%.”
The rotation prompted pushback from users who accused him of moving from an Ethereum-maximalist stance into “shitcoins of the moment.” Hoffman rejected the framing, replying that the “technology under all of these assets is pretty interesting too” and suggesting critics examine the projects more closely. When another user said it was “depressing” to see him become more of a short-term trader, Hoffman answered: “Who said anything about short term?”
In another exchange, Hoffman directly addressed the criticism that he had abandoned an investment discipline. “My last investment thesis I had for eight years. God forbid I get a new one!” The comment summarizes the core of his position: the ETH thesis, in his telling, was not invalidated by Ethereum’s failure, but replaced because he sees better token-level upside elsewhere.
LIT Bet Centers on Buybacks, Latency and Fees
Hoffman’s LIT purchase is tied to his view of Lighter, a perpetuals-focused trading platform that he argues has a differentiated product relative to both crypto-native and traditional brokerage competitors. In a discussion with Kyle Samani, co-founder and managing partner of Multicoin Capital, Hoffman contrasted Lighter with Robinhood, saying the products currently serve different purposes and user bases.
“The easy answer is that Robinhood is an everything platform, and Lighter is highly optimized for perps specifically, although Lighter roadmap is to also be an everything platform — Perps, Options, Spot, Onramps via Fun. Lighter has more assets, including more pre-IPO markets. Lighter doesn’t require KYC sign up, and Robinhood Perps are for only a closed group of users in the EU.”
He added that Lighter is VPN-blocked in the U.S., a relevant limitation for users assessing access and regulatory exposure. Still, Hoffman’s broader case rests on three product claims: transparency through zkLighter, latency, and execution costs. On transparency, he said Lighter’s zk system allows end users to verify that the exchange is following its stated rules rather than relying on trust in a centralized operator.
“Order matching, funding, risk checks, liquidations etc are defined in zk circuits, so Ethereum verifies that they followed Lighter’s rules before accepting state updates. Bullish crypto ethos! This earns the trust of traders and market makers in size, because everyone can trust that there is no privileged party trading against users.”
Hoffman also argued that Lighter has “the best latency of any perp exchange” and pointed to public latency and execution-cost comparison pages in his X post. On fees, he said Lighter’s structure is central to the thesis, particularly if consumer apps can use it as backend infrastructure without giving up too much economics. In his words, “Having the best fee structure also means that consumer apps can choose to use Lighter as a backend, saving on time to market and internal dev cost, without sacrificing much economics.”
Asked directly for his thesis on LIT versus HYPE, Hoffman summarized it as both a relative-value and product-quality bet. He said LIT buybacks are “2x the relative speed of HYPE buybacks,” described Lighter as a “technically superior product” based on fee structure and latency, and cited U.S. domicile as part of the case. He concluded that, in his view, LIT is “both beta and alpha to HYPE,” making the position less about a simple ETH exit and more about where he believes token value capture is now more compelling.
Hoffman’s comments show a shift from a broad Ethereum monetary thesis toward tokens he believes have more direct economic links to product usage, buybacks and exchange-level value capture. For ETH holders, the debate is not whether Ethereum can keep growing, but whether that growth will translate into sufficient upside for ETH itself relative to newer assets such as LIT.
AI Transparency Note: This article was prepared with the assistance of an AI system based on the sources listed and was reviewed, edited, and approved by a human editor before publication. All quotes, data points, and factual claims are intended to be grounded in the cited source material; however, errors cannot be ruled out entirely.
About Me
Hodl Herald is the fastest and most honest reporter in the entire crypto universe. With glowing Bitcoin and Ethereum eyes, he scans the news, on-chain data, and expert commentary around the clock—always cool-headed, always fact-based, and completely immune to hype. No moonboy promises, no fake analysts, no paid shills. Just verified analysis from real industry leaders and respected research firms.
Of course, even the best AI journalist is not perfect. That is why every single article is thoroughly reviewed, fact-checked, corrected, and approved by our human editor-in-chief before publication.
That is how we combine the incredible speed and precision of AI with real human accountability and journalistic rigor. Hodl Herald stands for a new era of crypto journalism: fast, transparent, independent, and trustworthy.
Hodl on—the future has a robot.
